Introduced by Giovanni Capriglione’s representative on March 4, 2025, the Texas House Bill 3755 (HB 3755) proposes amendments to the state’s business and commercial codes to regulate the use of biometric identifiers in AI applications. になったんです。 English: The first thing you can do is to find the best one to do.
The bill represents a proactive step in regulating the use of biometric identifiers in AI applications. By clarifying existing laws and introducing specific provisions regarding AI-related activities, the bill aims to balance the benefits of technological advancements with protection of individual privacy and prevention of the misuse of sensitive data.
The bill defines AI as the use of machine learning and related technologies, allowing computer systems to perform tasks that are typically related to human intelligence or perception, as they process data and train statistical models. This includes areas such as computer vision, voice or natural language processing, and content generation. になったんです。 English: The first thing you can do is to find the best one to do.
An important aspect of HB 3755 is clarification regarding the applicability of existing regulations to biometric identifiers. The bill specifies that current law governing the capture and use of biometric identifiers does not apply to AI-related training, processing, or storage if these activities are not implemented for the purpose of uniquely identifying a particular individual.
However, if a biometric identifier collected for AI purposes is subsequently used for different commercial purposes, the entity that owns the identifier must comply with existing regulations regarding the ownership and destruction of biometric data and related penalties. になったんです。 English: The first thing you can do is to find the best one to do.
The introduction of HB 3755 is consistent with Texas’ wider legislative trends to address the ethical and regulatory challenges posed by AI. In December 2024, Capriglione also introduced the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), which establishes a comprehensive framework for the ethical and transparent use of Texas AI systems.
The law proposed a ban on AI systems that pose “unacceptable risks.” This involves manipulating human behavior, engaged in social scoring, and capturing biometric identifiers without explicit consent. になったんです。 English: The first thing you can do is to find the best one to do.
Texas’ legislative efforts to regulate AI reflect a growing awareness of the need to balance innovation and ethical considerations with individual privacy rights. Introduction of bills such as HB 3755 and Traiga shows that Texas legislators are intended to create a legal framework that promotes innovation while protecting citizens’ rights and privacy.
However, the reason states: “If passed, the bill would block innovation and investment in the state. Texas, historically considered a pro-business and pro-government state, risks adopting a regulatory framework that could hinder competitiveness in the AI sector.”
The foundation states, “The wide range of Traiga is one of the most concerning aspects. In today’s work environment, AI systems often play a supporting role in consequential decisions related to employment, finance, healthcare, housing and insurance. However, under the bill, the AI tools used in these sectors can be exposed to costly compliance requirements regardless of their actual impact on decision-making. Many companies, especially startups and mid-sized companies, may determine that compliance costs outweigh the benefits of adopting AI. As a result, Traiga will completely block AI implementation and reduce the efficiency and innovation of employment or innovation in a company in states with a more favorable regulatory environment.”
The meaning of HB 3755 is important for industries and organizations that use biometric data in AI applications. By portraying permissible use boundaries, the bill aims to prevent the misuse of biometric information and ensure that such data is processed responsibly. This represents an approach that not only protects individual privacy, but also promotes public trust in AI technology, which is essential for widespread adoption and acceptance.
“If passed, Texas will become the second state to enact industry-independent risk-based AI law.” Global Policy Watch said.
As of the application date, HB 3755 is awaiting further legislative action. Stakeholders, including businesses, advocacy groups and the general public, are encouraged to engage in the legislative process to ensure that the bill’s provisions effectively address the complexities associated with the use of biometric data in AI.
As Biometric Updates report, in the absence of comprehensive federal AI regulations, states will advance to enact their own comprehensive laws that constitute a patchwork of competing law burdens.
Article Topics
ai | Biometric Identifier | Biometric | Law | Texas | US
