From healthcare and education to business and law enforcement, artificial intelligence has the ability to impact many aspects of our lives. For the past few months, I have chaired a research committee tasked with analyzing the potential of AI and making recommendations on how it should be regulated. The committee includes members of both parties and members of the public, many of whom are technology experts. Together, we traveled the state, heard from experts, and developed a set of recommendations to drive the conversation about how Wisconsin can address the opportunities and challenges posed by AI. .
One key recommendation is for Congress to focus on the data that powers AI technology, rather than the technology itself. AI systems rely on vast amounts of data to function, and that data often includes personal information. Mishandling data can put personal privacy at risk. By focusing on data privacy, Congress can ensure that Wisconsin residents are protected from potential harm from the misuse of their data without stifling innovation. Additionally, Congress should learn from the experiences of other states when it comes to regulating AI. Some states are rushing to pass comprehensive AI laws. Many of these states are now rushing to implement changes in these bills, sometimes before the original laws go into effect. Wisconsin should avoid this trap by focusing on high-risk areas where AI is likely to be misused or misused. Rather than blanket regulations, lawmakers need to take a targeted approach that protects vulnerable individuals while allowing innovation to flourish. It is also important to ensure that existing laws apply to AI models in the same way they apply to individuals and businesses. Many AI technologies already fall within the scope of current consumer protection, discrimination, and liability laws. Legislators should ensure that AI is governed by these established frameworks, rather than enacting redundant laws that give special treatment to AI. This approach will prevent confusion while making clear that AI is subject to accountability like any other technology. Education and workforce development should also be a priority. Wisconsin is already proactive in training its workforce through initiatives such as the Fast Forward program, which funds skills development. As AI reshapes industries, countries should expand the scope of existing programs to include AI upskilling and education. Being proactive in this regard will help ensure Wisconsin wins in the future.
Public safety is another area where AI can provide significant benefits. Congress should consider how AI can be leveraged to enhance public safety while ensuring proper oversight to avoid abuse and overreach.
Finally, states must ensure transparency and accountability in AI governance. The executive branch should be tasked with promulgating administrative regulations to provide clear and consistent guidance for the use of AI in state government. This would allow Congress to oversee how AI is being deployed within state government agencies and ensure it is in the public interest. Similarly, Congress should consider creating a standing commission of inquiry or a new legislative standing committee dedicated to oversight of emerging technologies, including AI. Such a committee would provide a long-term, flexible approach to managing AI challenges while avoiding knee-jerk reactions.
By focusing on recommendations, Congress can position Wisconsin as a leader in AI and help shape a future where AI serves the public good while protecting individual rights.
(Senator Julian Bradley (R-Franklin) represents the state’s 28th Senate District, which covers parts of Milwaukee, Waukesha, Racine, and Walworth counties. He can be reached at 608-266-5400 or electronically. Email sen.bradley@legis.wisconsin.gov.)
