California is at the forefront of innovation as a 70 % home base of one of the world’s leading artificial intelligence companies. That position is responsible for leading wise AI regulations. California must continue to move forward and continue to lead the AI progress, but it must also follow the example set by the European Union, which has recently passed the world’s first comprehensive AI method, AI. 。
However, on Tuesday, President Donald Trump abandoned the former President Joe Biden’s AI President’s Order, aimed at reducing the risk of consumers, workers, and national security provided by AI technology. Currently, it is a divided parliament, and we can hardly expect Washington in this aspect in the foreseeable future. We need to work with the California European Union to lead an international technical Conglomarit and set up a model to protect consumers.
For example, California led a significant progress in this field in this field, for example, in accordance with Senator Bill Dodde. For example, the Emergency Service Bureau says, “It is necessary to perform the risk analysis of potential threats caused by the use of generated artificial intelligence in California, which can lead to large -scale victim events. Infrastructure.
California Artificial Intelligence Transparency, a member of Senator Josh Becker, requires a label to such content, including deceived Ceptive or deep -fur content, which has a problem with large -scale generated AI companies. By providing AI detection tools to people, it helps users to understand whether the user is generated in AI. Such labels are not available. The legislative effort, which was not involved in the law, gives insights on the following steps at the 2025-26 legislative conference because it has not reached the governor’s desk or rejected. In general, all new AI initiatives should be treated between the state assembly and my colleagues, through lenses that harmonize with international partners, such as the European Union. It has been agreed. Since the EU has developed the AI method and develops related general -purpose AI practical norms, my colleagues and I are studying European approaches to identify efficiency and reflect on regulations. 。
Incorrect information, indicators, uniform standards
Above all, as a state, we must fight incorrect information. As the generated AI ability increases, the threat of incorrect information and false information intensifies. Last year’s synthetic content detection has led to its foundation, but further procedures are required to deal with this issue in the age of advanced generation systems. Second, it is necessary to improve the metric used for regulations. The state focuses on technical metrics, such as a floating point operation per second (one scale of the computer performance) and a harm -based approach targeting a specific use case. You need to. This guarantees flexibility and avoiding stuffy innovation.
Next, it is essential to establish a uniform standard. Defining important terms such as “artificial intelligence” and “automatic decision system” was an important step in creating clarity in the spread of the AI method. Accurate and uniform definitions enable effective regulations and execution. In addition, considering that many companies must comply with the already established international standards and laws, it reduces compliance costs.
Balance
Finally, it is important to balance innovation and protection means. California is not a drastic measure, but continues to emphasize the target of the target and in -specific regulations. This approach matches the Commitment of Governor Gavin Newsom for responsible innovation, guarantees that it will be realized without risk or barriers that the possibility of a company or government will change. 。 We have achieved our goals, but we need to establish a clearly defined guardrail that has been narrowly adjusted to avoid unnecessarily high compliance costs. So far, California has enacted 17 AI -related laws and has become a state with the most important AI program in Japan. By balancing the possibility of AI and protecting the people from the danger, this legislation effort guarantees that California will continue to lead the AI innovation and regulations. Thoughtful regulations are not a barrier, but a responsible innovation, and guarantees that AI will be useful for humanity for the future.
This commentary was first published in Sacramentby.
